Who Said Photography
full frame VS APS-C
Down Arrow

Full Frame vs APS-C: The Ultimate Camera Smackdown

Full Frame vs APS-C, another longstanding discussion the photography community has been wrestling with for decades. This issue took centre stage when digital cameras were introduced, as APS-C cameras benefited from their smaller, less expensive sensors. So, why is this debate still pertinent? Simply put, each type of sensor offers unique advantages and pitfalls. The sensor that best meets your needs will depend on numerous parameters. Thus, this debate continues. So let the force guide your way. 😊

Importance of understanding camera sensor sizes

Embracing the concept of camera sensor sizes is a phenomenal stepping stone to mastering photography. After all, the sensor – the digital film of the camera – is the heart of capture. Its size significantly influences image quality, low-light performance, depth of field, and lens compatibility. Essentially, it determines the raw potential of your camera’s capabilities. Understanding sensors is crucial for photographers to choose the right camera and enhance their photography in any situation. Grasp this knowledge, and every photo shoot becomes an opportunity to showcase your camera wisdom. Now, let’s delve deeper into this intriguing aspect of photography.

Table of Contents

Exploring Full Frame vs APS-C Sensors

Understand what is Full Frame Sensor and its origin

A Full Frame sensor is a term coined which refers to the sensor sizes. Full-frame is traditional the same size as 35mm film, measuring 24mm high and 36mm wide. This establishes an aspect ratio of 3:2, which determines the proportions of each photo. Full Frame, AKA 35 mm, used to be the standard in the industry. Professional photographers heavily depended on them before digital cameras were introduced. A key facet of Full Frame sensors is their larger pixel size, leading to superior image quality and low-light performance.

The genesis of Full Frame sensors is intertwined with the history of photography itself. The 35mm film, which is equivalent to a full frame sensor, was dominant in still photography until digital substitutes emerged. Throughout the years, these sensors have seen significant advancements, improving their efficiency and influencing the evolution of photography.

  • 1940s-1950s: The concept of a “full-frame” sensor did not exist, as film was the primary medium for photography. Early cameras typically used large format film, equivalent to full-frame in digital terms.
  • Late 1990s: The first digital full-frame sensor was introduced in the Kodak DCS 560, based on a Nikon F5 body. It had a resolution of 6 megapixels.
  • 2002: Canon released the EOS-1Ds, the first full-frame DSLR designed for professional use, with a 11.1-megapixel sensor.
  • 2004: Nikon introduced the D2X, its first full-frame DSLR, with a 12.4-megapixel sensor.
  • 2008: Sony released the Alpha 900, the first full-frame DSLR in their Alpha series. It featured a 24.6-megapixel sensor.
  • 2008, Canon introduced the EOS 5D Mark II, a camera that revolutionized videography with its full-frame sensor and ability to record 1080p video.
  • 2012: Nikon released the D800, featuring a 36.3-megapixel full-frame sensor, setting a new standard for high-resolution photography.
  • 2012: Sony introduced the Alpha 99, their flagship full-frame DSLT (Digital Single Lens Translucent) camera with a 24.3-megapixel sensor.
  • 2013: Canon unveiled the EOS 6D, a more affordable full-frame option, with a 20.2-megapixel sensor.
  • 2015: Sony released the Alpha 7R II, a mirrorless full-frame camera with a 42.4-megapixel sensor and 4K video recording, marking the rise of mirrorless full-frame cameras.
  • 2018: Nikon and Canon entered the mirrorless full-frame market with the Z6 and EOS R, respectively, marking a significant shift in the industry.
  • 2020s: Advancements in sensor technology continued, with increased resolutions, improved low-light performance, and enhanced dynamic range in full-frame sensors across various brands.

This timeline highlights important steps in the creation of full-frame sensors, but there have been many other improvements and camera models in this area. The technology continues to evolve, offering photographers more choices and capabilities.

The APS-C camera sensor: an overview and its origin

Smaller than full frame but mighty in its own right, the APS-C crop sensor rose to prominence as a more travel-friendly, affordable alternative. Launched in the late 90s. APS-C sensor was inspired by the discontinued APS film format, enabling manufacturers to design sleeker and less pricey cameras.

  • In the 2000s, digital photography became popular, and APS-C sensors became common in DSLR and mirrorless cameras. These sensors were a good choice because they were smaller, cheaper, and still provided good image quality.
  • In 2004, Canon released the EOS 300D (Digital Rebel), which was one of the first DSLRs with an APS-C sensor for regular consumers. This marked the beginning of the APS-C digital era.
  • 2004: Nikon released the D70, another popular DSLR with an APS-C sensor, competing with Canon’s offerings.
  • 2007: Sony launched the Alpha 700, featuring a 12.2-megapixel APS-C sensor and the beginning of their Alpha DSLR series.
  • 2008: Nikon released the D90, the first DSLR to include video recording, further popularizing APS-C cameras for both photography and videography.
  • 2010: Canon’s EOS 7D was released with an 18-megapixel APS-C sensor, setting new standards for autofocus performance and speed.
  • 2013: Sony announced the Alpha 3000, an APS-C mirrorless camera, expanding the use of APS-C sensors beyond DSLRs.
  • 2016: Fujifilm X-T2 gained recognition for its advanced features, including a 24.3-megapixel APS-C sensor, marking the rise of APS-C mirrorless cameras.
  • 2018: Canon’s EOS M50, a mirrorless APS-C camera, showcased their commitment to this sensor format in the mirrorless segment.
  • 2020s: APS-C cameras continued to advance with improved sensors, faster processors, and enhanced video capabilities, making them a popular choice for enthusiasts, vloggers, and certain professional applications.

Here are some top features of APS-C crop sensor:

  • Compact in size,
  • Cost-effective,
  • Ideal for wildlife and sports photography due to the crop factor.
  • Wide availability of compatible lenses.

With the right understanding and application, APS-C sensors can certainly hold their own against full-frame in various photographic scenarios. The ultimate decision comes down to your specific needs and preferences as a photographer.

Deep Dive into the Differences

Considerations based on camera size and weight

Size and weight play a significant role in the Full Frame vs. APS-C camera debate. Full-frame cameras are bigger and heavier because they have larger sensors that need larger lenses. It helps people with larger hands by improving grip and making it easier to hold and use. This gives an edge to Full Frame cameras when it comes to image quality as their larger size and sensors result in richer and more detailed photos.

On the flip side, APS-C cameras are typically smaller, lighter, and more portable. A good option for taking photos on the go or during activities that require a lot of movement, travelling, hiking, and backpacking. Despite the smaller size of APS-C cameras and lenses, they should not be underestimated. These cameras have a compact design but are powerful, making them easier to use and more convenient for busy people.

So, it boils down to weighing the trade-off between size and performance. If you prioritize image quality and ergonomics and don’t mind the added weight and size, Full Frame could be your go-to. But, if portability and convenience are more important to you, then APS-C may be the better choice.

Impact on lens compatibility and crop factor

When it comes to photography, one of the challenges lies in grasping the extent to which sensors affect lens compatibility. This becomes especially evident when we compare Full-frame and APS-C cameras. Full-frame cameras have a crop factor of 1x, indicating that the focal length of the lens mirrors its marked length.

Contrastingly, APS-C cameras have a higher crop factor, usually around the 1.5x or 1.6x mark. This figure plays a significant role in the lens’s effective focal length. Images appear elongated on APS-C cameras in comparison to Full-frame, a feature that can significantly benefit telephoto photography. However, it could bring about a limited field of view for wide-angle shots.

Lens compatibility isn’t overlooked in an APS-C vs. Full-Frame comparison. Lenses designed for Full-Frame cameras adapt well to APS-C cameras. This adjustment is possible because the effective focal length multiplies by the crop factor. Conversely, lenses specifically engineered for APS-C may fail to encompass the full image circle on Full-Frame cameras. Remember, understanding crop factor helps in making informed lens choices for your camera.

Pro-Tip: Full Frame lenses can fit an APS-C camera, but not visa-versa. Unless your Full Frame has an option for APS-C

Varying dynamic range between full frame and APS-C

Dynamic range is a key performance indicator when comparing Full Frame and APS-C cameras. It refers to the camera sensor’s ability to grasp variations in light, from deep shadows to bright highlights, all in a single shot. Full Frame sensors, due to their larger surface area, outshine their APS-C counterparts in this realm. More light can be captured by these sensors, thereby enriching the dynamic range. This allows detailed imaging in complex lighting situations and high-contrast scenes.

On the flip side, APS-C sensors, with their smaller size, periodically struggle with dynamic range. Although providing clear, high-quality images, their reduced physical size restricts the light absorption capability, limiting the dynamic range. Understanding the dynamic range difference between Full Frame and APS-C sensors is important when choosing the right camera for your needs.

Performance Comparison

Comparing low-light performances

When evaluating the full-frame and APS-C camera smackdown, one crucial consideration is their low-light performance. This aspect measures the efficiency of camera sensors in low light conditions, such as shooting at twilight or in poorly lit interiors.

Primarily, full-frame cameras trump in this category due to their larger sensor pixels, allowing them to gather light more lavishly. This capacity to harness ample light results in greater image quality under low-light settings. Larger pixels lower noise levels and enhance sensitivity, giving cleaner, more intricately detailed images in limited light.

APS-C cameras have smaller pixels because their sensor size is limited. This can make them vulnerable to noise in low-light conditions. Nevertheless, don’t dismiss APS-C just yet! Recent APS-C models showcase significant advancements in low-light performance. This technological leap has bridged the gap between full-frame and APS-C cameras.

Although full-frame cameras have traditionally been favoured for low-light photography, the current generation of APS-C cameras is keeping pace admirably. Remember to keep yourself updated with the newest models to make an informed choice.

Understanding the effect on depth of field

In the realm of photography, the relationship between camera sensor size and depth of field is required. Depth of field in photography refers to the range of focus in a photo, encompassing objects both near and far from the camera.If you’re wondering, it’s your camera’s sensor size that delivers the knockout punch on this playfield.

Full-frame cameras, with their larger sensors, provide a more shallow depth of field. With these heavyweights, you get the bonus of significant background separation and subject isolation. Portrait photographers love using full-frame cameras because they can create stunning portraits with a beautiful blurry background effect called bokeh. Okay, Okay ya, ya! Most upper level portrait photographers are moving to medium format. But medium format cameras are not the topic of discussion.

On the other hand, APS-C cameras, smaller in sensor size, offer a deeper depth of field. This characteristic allows for sharper focus in larger areas, making them excellent for landscape photography or situations that require a wider focus area.

Pros and Cons for Each Sensor Type

Full frame vs APS-C camera sensor comparision

Advantages and Disadvantages of full frame sensor cameras

Professionals highly praise full-frame sensor cameras for their superior image quality and features in the photography world. However, they also come with some notable disadvantages.


  • Superior Image Quality: Thanks to larger pixels, full-frame sensor cameras offer higher image quality with clearer, sharp focus.
  • Excellent Low-Light Performance: These cameras perform remarkably in challenging lighting conditions, producing noise-free images even after ISO adjustments.
  • Wider Dynamic Range: Full-frame sensors capture a wider range, enhancing the detail in shadows and highlights.
  • Shallow Depth of Field: Full-frame cameras allow for greater control over background blur, which is a boon for portrait and close-up photography.
  • Advanced Features: Weather-resistant bodies, impressive autofocus systems, and valuable customizations make full-frame cameras ideal for professionals.
  • Greater Resale Value: Full-frame cameras tend to hold their value better over time, making them a better investment for some photographers.
  • Larger and Brighter Viewfinders: Full-frame cameras typically have larger and brighter optical viewfinders, providing a better shooting experience.
  • Better Performance in Extreme Conditions: The larger sensors can handle harsh lighting conditions and extreme temperature ranges more effectively.
  • Improved Bokeh and Subject Isolation: The larger sensor size combined with a wider aperture lens results in more pronounced bokeh and better subject isolation in portrait and macro photography.


  • Higher Cost: Full-frame cameras may not be budget-friendly, with high costs attached to camera body, lenses, and accessories.
  • Bigger Size and Weight: Their size and weight can limit portability, making them less ideal for travel or handheld photography.
  • Expensive Lens Options: Full-frame cameras require lenses made specifically for large sensors, which sometimes adds to the expense.
  • Not Beginner-Friendly: Their advanced features might be overwhelming for beginners in photography.
  • Detailed Maintenance Required: With additional features comes additional maintenance needs, such as frequent sensor cleaning.

Pros and Cons of APS-C Cameras

Pros of APS-C Sensors:

  • Cost-Effective: APS-C cameras and lenses are generally more affordable than their full-frame counterparts.
  • Compact and Lightweight: APS-C cameras are often smaller and lighter, making them ideal for travel and everyday photography.
  • APS-C sensors have a greater depth of field, which is useful for macro or landscape photography.
  • APS-C sensors have a versatile zoom range that allows lenses to effectively capture wildlife and sports scenes without needing very long lenses.
  • APS-C cameras are often chosen by videographers because they have good video performance and less rolling shutter effects.
  • High Frame Rates: Some APS-C cameras feature fast continuous shooting speeds, which are useful for sports and action photography.
  • Improved Battery Life: Smaller sensors consume less power, which can lead to longer battery life in APS-C cameras.
  • Crop Factor Advantage: The crop factor can be useful for telephoto work, effectively extending the reach of your lenses.

Cons of APS-C Sensors:

  • APS-C sensors have smaller pixels than full-frame sensors, which can cause more noise at higher ISO settings.
  • APS-C sensors make it harder to achieve the same level of background blur as full-frame cameras.
  • Narrower Field of View: APS-C sensors capture a narrower field of view, which may not be ideal for wide-angle photography.
  • Dynamic Range Limitations: Full-frame sensors often have a wider dynamic range, capturing more detail in both highlights and shadows.
  • Lens Compatibility: While APS-C cameras can use full-frame lenses, the reverse is not always true, limiting your lens choices.
  • For certain industries, professional photographers may need the image quality and features provided by full-frame cameras. However, this can be a limitation for APS-C cameras.
  • Resale Value: APS-C cameras tend to depreciate in value faster compared to full-frame cameras.
  • Full-frame cameras are often preferred for large prints or commercial work that requires the highest resolution, as they offer better image quality compared to APS-C cameras.

Key Scenarios: Which sensor to choose?

Best choice for Beginners: Full Frame or APS-C?

Stepping into the world of photography can be overwhelming, with an array of cameras to choose from – Full Frame or APS-C. Both offer their advantages, but your choice ultimately depends on your needs and circumstances as a beginner. Full Frame cameras have better image quality, especially in low-light situations, and a wider dynamic range. They are ideal for capturing impressive shots, particularly when dealing with challenging lighting conditions. However, it is quite the heavyweight on the wallet and could demand a greater investment in lenses and accessories.

On the other hand, APS-C sensors are friendly on the budget. Their smaller size and lighter weight make them ideal for those constantly on the move, without compromising image quality. They are a convenient kit for new photographers who want to start exploring the world of photography.

Remember, no choice is wrong or right, but tailored to your photography aspirations, budget, and preferences. If prioritizing image quality and prepared to make a higher investment, a Full Frame camera is worth considering. However, if portability and affordability top your list, an APS-C sensor camera is a solid starting point.

Full Frame vs. APS-C for Wildlife or Bird Photography

Full Frame Vs APS-C fro wildlife photography Copywrite WhosaidPhotography.com

Capturing stunning wildlife and bird images is a feat that requires not only skill but also the right photographic gear. When it comes to sensor size, Full Frame cameras often lead the battle with higher resolution, better image quality and ability to perform well in low-light conditions – all thanks to a larger sensor size. Plus, a wider selection of telephoto lenses enhances your reach for wildlife photography.

On the other hand, APS-C cameras shine with their crop factor, extending your lenses’ focal length. This gives you more reach without needing lengthy telephoto lenses – a significant advantage for wildlife photography. The smaller size and lighter weight accompanying APS-C cameras make them a perfect companion for outdoor photography adventures.

Professional wildlife photographers usually prefer using a Full Frame camera for its superior image quality. However, APS-C cameras can also capture stunning results when paired with high-quality lenses.It’s not just about the gear; your skill and knowledge about wildlife are paramount in capturing breathtaking moments.

When making a choice between Full Frame and APS-C cameras, take into account your budget, shooting style, desired image quality, and the specific species you wish to capture in photographs. These factors are as crucial as the camera sensor size in shaping your wildlife or bird photography journey.

Optimum sensor type for Landscape Photography

The art of capturing the natural scenery requires a particular toolset; a camera sensor plays a major role in it.

Full Frame cameras often have the upper-hand for landscape photography due to their larger sensor size. These cameras capture more details and exhibit a better dynamic range, preserving precious details in highlights and shadows. Plus, they offer a wider selection of wide-angle lenses – perfect for encapsulating those expansive natural scenes.

Using an APS-C camera with its crop factor can be beneficial if you frequently take photos of faraway subjects or use perspective compression in your landscape compositions. Besides, considering the affordability factor, APS-C cameras can be a more budget-friendly choice.

Your camera pick should depend on your specific landscape photography needs, budget constraints, and desired image quality. Full Frame cameras are preferred by professionals for their superior image quality and wide lens selection. However, APS-C cameras are also highly capable. These cameras can deliver excellent landscape images, especially when paired with high-quality lenses and proper photographic techniques.

Remember, the key to capturing a compelling landscape photograph is the right blend of composition, lighting, and post-processing techniques. Your camera’s sensor size becomes secondary.

Conclusion: Full Frame vs. APS-C Smackdown verdict

Summarizing the sensor type suitable for different conditions

In the Full Frame vs. APS-C camera debate, both have their strengths. Full Frame cameras offer superior image quality, more comprehensive dynamic range, better low-light performance, and a shallower depth of field. They’re often chosen by professionals or photographers with higher budgets valuing exceptional image quality.

Full Frame cameras often excel in conditions requiring high image quality, low-light capacity, and field-depth control. They’re preferred in professional genres like portrait, stars, or wildlife photography.

APS-C cameras, on the other hand, are beloved for their affordability, compactness, and the crop factor’s reach extension. These cameras are a prevalent choice for beginners, enthusiasts, or those on a tight budget. I often use mine for Macro photography, for this reason.

Your choice between Full Frame and APS-C should depend on your specific needs, preferences, and shooting conditions. Consider your budget, style, desired image quality, and the specific scenarios planned for when making your choice.

Understanding camera sensor sizes, their impact on image quality, low-light performance, depth of field, and lens compatibility is pivotal. To choose the best camera and lenses for your photography needs and budget, experiment with different options, conduct research, and consult with experts or ask your fellow members of your photo club.

So, Full Frame or APS-C? The answer lies in your needs.

Choosing based on individual requirements and preferences

What a contentious showdown this has been! When comparing Full Frame and APS-C cameras, it’s clear that neither is the absolute winner. Both contenders have their strengths and weaknesses. Your individual requirements, shooting style, and budget are crucial factors in making this decision.

The undisputed champion in image quality, unrivalled low-light performance, and depth of field control is undoubtedly the Full Frame camera. It is the irresistible choice for those who value top-tier image output. APS-C cameras are affordable and portable. They also produce good results, which makes them a great choice for beginners or photographers on a tight budget.

In this quest, it’s essential to remember not to simply rely on specifications or recommendations alone; do field-testing with different cameras and lenses, and seek advice from others photographers. Be informed, take into account your shooting habits, and most importantly, your goals.

So, there you have it! The Full Frame vs. APS-C verdict rests significantly in understanding what’s best for you. Finding the right camera is about choosing one that feels like a part of you. It should help you express your creativity and capture the images you imagine. Your chosen tool should align with your budget without compromising your style. Remember, photography isn’t about having the most expensive gear but about capturing the right moment, in your unique way.

Frequently Asked Questions

Whether a Full-frame camera is better than an APS-C greatly depends on your photography goals and preferences. Full-frame offers a greater dynamic range and no crop factor, ideal for landscapes and architecture. However, APS-C cameras can excel in certain scenarios and may be more cost-effective.

APS-C and Full Frame sensors are different camera sensor sizes. A Full Frame sensor is larger than an APS-C sensor, meaning it captures more light, resulting in better image quality, especially in low light. APS-C cameras, however, are smaller, lighter and more portable, ideal for travel and street photography.

Indeed, a full-frame camera can give a shallower depth of field, or bokeh effect. This distinction is more noticeable when using the same lens type on full-frame and APS-C cameras. Factors such as aperture setting, focal length, and subject distance also have significant effects.

Our Latest Blogs